Letters to the Editor

Council president says sale of Lynn-owned land on Route 1 could help with school repairs

To the editor:

I am and always have been an avid supporter and protector  of Lynn Woods. For years, my son Ryan and I have spent a lot of time there, hiking, walking our dog or just exploring.

The City of Lynn owns a substantial amount of land on Route 1 North, located in the Town of Lynnfield.

It is not part of Lynn Woods nor is it conservation land as some letter writers have incorrectly pointed out since I proposed an innovative idea for our public schools in recent debates.  An extensive Title Examination was conducted by the City in 2007 regarding approximately 22 acres of this land, followed by a written legal opinion which specifically indicated  this parcel is not part of Lynn Woods and the land contains no restrictions or conditions which affect its marketability.  I would never try to sell Lynn Woods land,  on the contrary I would protect it. This land is located on both sides and around the Fat Cactus Restaurant. A part of the land actually has a billboard there now.  This portion of Route 1 North is littered with Car Dealerships, Restaurants and stores with the exception of the land owned by the City of Lynn. This makes no sense. The City of Lynn has an estimated $20 million worth of building repairs needed for our old crumbling schools and no money to do so. The estimated value is $750,000 to  a million dollars per acre (22 acres).  I am proposing we sell or lease this land and create a revolving account solely used for the repair of our public schools.  The City of Lynn should not own and do nothing with one of the only undeveloped pieces of land on Route 1. It is a valuable piece of property and the real estate development market is good,  as evidenced by the highly successful new Lynnfield walking mall. It is creative thinking,  a new revenue source, will free up City funds for other uses and the kids of Lynn deserve it.

Very truly yours,

Tim Phelan

Lynn City Council President

1 comment for “Letters to the Editor

  1. Arby_5925
    November 5, 2013 at 2:15 pm

    The fact that this area is “littered with car dealerships, restaurants, and stores” is all the more reason to protect this land from development. Any land that acts as a buffer between Rt. 1 and our water supply has far more value than the estimated one-time price of $750k that we might get from its loss.

    The thought of selling this land is short-sighted and is one of the few things that I’ve heard in this election cycle that gives me a reason to go to the polls.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.